Somatic Exercise Cycles -- The Power of Integration

Somatic exercise cycles are sequences of somatic exercises done repeatedly to accomplish a purpose.

Somatic exercises are methodically-done movement patterns that work with so-called "muscle memory" (actually, better stated as "movement memory") to dissolve habitual patterns of movement memory (implanted by trauma and stress, such as pain and stiffness associated with aging) and to replace them with healthier, more variable and free patterns of movement memory.

Now, if you've got that paragraph under your belt,
we may continue . . . . .

If not, better go back and get it, as everything that follows builds upon it.

There.

Now, each somatic exercise works with a single movement pattern -- examples being inhalation, exhalation, backward bending, forward bending, twisting, etc.

In life and movement, at least two movement patterns are always involved with any action.  Every bending movement must have its opposite straightening movement; every twisting, its untwisting.  Without its opposite, we are stuck.  Imagine going through life bent over and twisted.  Know somebody like that?

That's a small clue to the use of somatic exercises to undo unhealthy stuck patterns of movement.  (What makes them unhealthy is the excessive muscular tension and lack of suppleness that's involved -- leading to nerve impingement, joint degeneration, chronic pain.)  Movement patterns assemble into patterns of coordination.

Hence, the array of somatic exercises found in Thomas Hanna's "Myth of Aging" series and in my own "special purpose" somatic exercise programs.  They fit together like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle to constitute patterns of coordination for activity in daily life.

Somatic exercises work two ways:
  1. to undo the habituation we might have in a posture or movement pattern
  2. to develop healthier patterns of posture and better control of movement -- generally free-er and better-functioning
To do so, somatic exercises awaken awareness of how we are habituated/stuck and develop voluntary control of those habituated patterns (generally, simultaneously) so that we can either do habitual movements more freely or move differently, freely and at-will.

So far, so good.  Still with me?

OK.

Now, just as visual depth perception requires two viewpoints (left eye and right eye), and just as visual depth perception gives us more and different visual information than sight through one eye, more than one somatic exercise can address a habituated/stuck movement pattern or posture, and when more than one is used, we get a kind of kinesthetic depth perception that gives us both more sensory information and more control than we can get by one somatic exercise, alone.

Here's where somatic exercise cycles come into play.

There exists a way of using more than one (and more than two) somatic exercises to address especially stuck conditions or to get larger changes faster with not-so-stuck conditions.

The steps are these:
  1. Identify two or more related somatic exercises that either belong to the same larger coordination pattern or that address the same muscle groups in different ways.
  2. Practice each exercise until well-internalized (remembered and fruitful in producing its specifically-intended change.  (rule of thumb:  seven cycles or until "milked for all it's worth")
  3. Cycle through the identified exercises, one after the other.
I'll give you some examples of related somatic exercises that can be assembled in this way.

RELATED BY LARGER COORDINATION PATTERN

example:  Lesson 1 of The Myth of Aging series
Landau Reaction is a movement/action pattern involved in sitting, standing, and walking.  It involves the backs of the shoulders, spinal erector muscles, buttocks, and hamstrings.  Its purpose is to bring the person erect through the action of backward extension.

Lesson 1 of this series, therefore, involves movement elements for each of these places, first done individually, then assembled into a single, larger pattern.

This exercise, when followed by Lesson 2 of The Myth of Aging series (which addresses the movement of curling forward), constitutes a "unit of movement" -- straightening and bending.

That understood, I can now identify four entire somatic exercise lessons that, when learned and then put into a cycle, get more done than any one of the exercises can, by itself:
  1. Lesson 1 of The Myth of Aging series
  2. Somatic Exercise for Hip Joint Pain (posterior)
  3. Free Your Hamstrings
  4. The Athletes' Prayer for Loose Calves
Each of these exercises gets something done that is not done well by the others; each addresses an element of Landau Reaction; each provides its piece of the "jigsaw puzzle".  I've noted four movements; you could do three or two, but more movements provide higher integration.

The proper approach is to learn each of these exercises well and to get the result of each, then to cycle through them, (1.) - (4.), repeatedly.

Of course, other sequences of exercises, related by function, exist.

In the program, Free Your Psoas, the first exercise, "Locating the Center of Breathing", produces system-wide changes in the direction of greater freedom.  The second exercise, "Slide and Turn", disarms muscular restrictions that force legs into a knee-out or knee-in twist that would interfere with the third exercise, Walking into the Floor, which requires that freedom (and awakening of sensory awareness) to reach the psoas muscles.  The exercises that follow integrate the freedom resulting from the earlier exercises into a well-coordinated pattern.

So, I've just outlined two different approaches to using more than one somatic exercise to accomplish a single purpose.


RELATED BY THE SAME MUSCLE GROUP BEING INVOLVED
There exist situations where the trauma of an injury is so great that a person contracts (involuntarily) a single muscle or muscle group so strongly (with the physiological intention to immobilize), and in entanglement with other muscular actions that no one somatic exercise is sufficient to disarm the situation.

Here's where two or more somatic exercises that address the involved region can get the job done.  It's a little like having more than one person reassure you that "everything is all right", vs. having just one person reassure you.

example:  The Gluteus Medius Muscles
A condition of having your leg yanked in an accident (such as falling off a horse with your foot caught in the stirrup and being dragged for a quarter mile) provides a protective response of holding on to your leg for dear life.  You prefer to keep your leg attached.  So you (reflexively) contract all of the muscles around your hip joint.

Well and good.  You've kept your leg; but you've lost freedom, as now those muscles are painfully contracted all the time.

It's not about any one muscle, but about an action involving muscle pulls from many directions, at once, but all summating/adding together to hold onto your leg.

The glueus medius muscles have several movement functions:
  1. providing stability during walking or running, as the pelvis turns from side-to-side (i.e., active external rotation of the thigh in the hip joint)
  2. movement of the leg backward (extension)
  3. pulling your hip bone and thigh together (hipbone/iliac crest down) in an action that lifts the opposite hip, in walking
  4. (Note that although these muscles can abduct (move sideways) the leg, that's not their typical function.)
In the situation described, no one somatic exercise addresses all these movements.  However, a combination of exercises can address these movements.

A corresponding combination might be:
  1. Lesson 4 of the Myth of Aging series
  2. Somatic Exercise for Hip Joint Pain (posterior)
  3. Lesson 8 of the Myth of Aging series
You first learn each of these exercises well (memory plus results); then cycle through them repeatedly -- according to your energy level, result obtained, and interest.

So that outlines the principles and practices of cycling through somatic exercises.

MORE:
Muscle Memory Isn't Muscle Memory
An Entirely New Class of Therapeutic Exercises
All Somatic Exercise Programs | Free Your Psoas | Free Yourself from Back Pain






The Omniverse Dream of Existence

"Row, row, row your boat
gently down the stream.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
life is but a dream."

This sagacious verse recapitulates (restates, re-presents) a concept found in Enlightenment philosophy -- the idea that life is illusory (Maya, samsara). It also holds a clue to one of the "hard" questions of neuroscience:  How do nervous impulses, electro-chemical pulses that travel along the length of nerves to, and within, the brain, get experienced as sensation?

It also, however, reinforces an error:  that life is illusory and should not be given credence.  Another term for this error is, irresponsibility.

This piece clarifies the idea and experience of "dreamed reality" and integrates it with the idea and experience of physical reality.

TENET 1:  There is no escape from experience.

TENET 2:  "Mind" and "body" are concepts that artificially and falsely suggest two separate things that are actually two perspectives -- a "field" perspective and a "particle" perspective -- of one thing.  Sensation and mental events are "field" experiences; movements are "particle" experiences.  Particle and field are one, just as sensation and movement are one and just as and mind-and-body are one.

TENET 3:  Dreams have both a tangible (objective) aspect and an intangible (subjective) aspect.

Rapid eye movements (REM) and other changes of physical state during dreams, and moving of the lips and mouth when learning to read show that dreaming and thinking have a tangible component.  It's the basis of the lie-detector test which, though not entirely reliable as a test of truth, is reliable as a way to measure subjective state.

TENET 4:  The Universe is a "dream of many dreams."   Obviously, there is the physical Universe, which, although measurable, we experience via the same kind of narratives and sensory experiences and thought processes by which we experience dreams -- and there are all the persons within that Universe, who, as individuals, have individual perspectives and unique dreams.  So, the Universe is a "dream of many dreams."

TENET 5:  The "physical" universe is a great domain where an indeterminate number of interaccommodating dreams co-exists within it.

TENET 6:  The "physical" universe is a focal-location of converging, but all slightly different, neighboring dream-universes; in their overlap (similarity), these neighboring universes mutually reinforce one-another.  With sufficient mutual reinforcement, matter congeals into tangible patterns, which we call physical reality, and those tangible patterns interact, which we call events. 

An indeterminate number of "physical" universes exists, each being a slightly different focal-location where neighboring, more or less similar, intercommunicating dream-Universes converge and co-exist.  They are all different, more or less.  "Closer" dream-Universes are more similar (a definition of convenience).  They are separated by (interface at) "zones of indeterminacy" (experienced by us as "zones of incomprehensibility").

TENET 7:  Human consciousness is a "tuning" process whose dreams (imaginings or memories) tune in (or match up) to closest-matching "physicality-patterns," giving rise to experiences that seem to confirm the truth of what is remembered or imagined. 

TENET 8:  In physical reality, the statistical probability of any event occurring in the HERE-NOW moment of a local Universe is either 0% or 100%, nothing else.

Other seeming statistical probabilities than 0% or 100% come from a mathematical way of looking at remembered things, a way of integrating memories of past occurrences in a single, abstract (mental and general, not physically specific) view.  Mathematical, statistical probability defines the position (probability) of this apparent universe in relation to the position (probability) of neighboring universes, in a balancing act of forces among them.  But the actuality of anything is either 0% or 100%.

TENET 9:  More fixated, less changeable forms of consciousness give rise to a "One Universe" experience, the way it gave rise to the "flat Earth" perception of the world.  Most human consciousness is a leaky "One Universe" experience, where dreams and alternate possibilities may encroach, but cannot "anchor" and become tangible, and so deflect.

TENET 10:  As consciousness (or somatic development) becomes more complex and flexible, it gives rise to more options for sensation and behavior, at first leading to development of new behaviors (and technology) drawn from closely neighboring universes, and eventually leading to the ability to attune to other "dreamed/actual" universes with different histories and futures (memories and imaginings, both tangible and intangible, objective and subjective).

TENET 11: With sufficient freedom to attune to neighboring universes ("non-attachment"), consciousness becomes able to shift its "center of gravity" by attuning to the feel of a neighboring universe, a phenomenon I call, "side-slipping".  The first step is to "lift anchor" by dissolving the grip of memory; the second step is to attune to an imagining.  Practically speaking, the old memory may serve as a "pushing off" point toward an imagining.  Lifting anchor and pushing off lead to a shift -- but only if escape velocity from the attraction of the old memory is achieved (anchor really lifted).  Death is a really good way for lifting anchor for a shift.

In such a shift, memories of the previous universe may persist ("I don't remember things being this way." "Something's changed.") or previous memories may dissolve (unnoticed side-slipping).  Memories either persisting or dissolving set the relative degree of availability of the previous memory of "how things were."  It's not that old experiences are "gone"; it's that they're improbable or hard to reach from the universe to which we are momentarily attuned.  In other words, "You may not (or no longer) be able to "get there from here" -- but there are neighboring universes closer to "there" to which you can attune, and from one of those neighboring universes, "get there" from the new "here".  Stepwise.

Alternately, instead of side-slipping, one may bring in information and capacities from a dream-universe into ones local universe. It may go either way.

"Row, row, row your boat
gently down the stream
-- any.
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
life is but a dream
-- one among many."

So, Life is a dreamed reality -- one among many -- but a dream with sufficient organizing forces (integrating forces of probability, or tendency) to give pattern to matter (the "sub-dream", substrate, or first-order creation), and to create patterns of higher order, such as objects or living somas (e.g., persons) or relationships (life events).

The first-order dream -- physical, inanimate reality -- consists of balancings of opposing physical forces and oscillations into-and-out-of existence (primal "vibration"), which goes on throughout the sub-atomic world.  The sub-atomic world scintillates.  That's the nature of electron fields, why they have the shapes that they do.

Atoms are equilibrium vortices where scintillations are sufficiently synchronized in balance to define a stable pattern of function that doesn't just disappear, and sufficiently a-synchronously unbalanced to show up as activity. Synchronization/balance are functions of the field, the dreamed-probability field.  (Don't bother asking, "Who is the dreamer?"  None is needed.  Dreaming is an emergent universal, or trans-universal, process, most primordial.  "Dreamers" are third-order manifestations that occur, developmentally, long after the first-order dream of "materiality" occurs, with the appearance of somas).

During the "out of existence" phase, the local-universe balancing-of-opposing-forces (at specific locations) disappears and the changing forces of tendency (dream-forces) of neighboring universes prevail.  The out-of-phase location of the universe comes back into existence instantaneously different -- as there exists no inertia in non-existence  -  influenced both by its own larger pattern-in-motion and by the pattern-in-motion of neighboring universes, in a kind of "Continental Drift" of the Universes. The drift occurs during the "out of existence" moments and then the local universe comes back into existence more-or-less changed or reshaped.  It's a kind of Universe side-slipping.  We call the alternation between in-existence (play of forces) and out-of-existence (no forces), "the dynamic of freedom", "activity", or "fundamental motion", or "fundamental time" -- Kosmic Foam, or Kosmic Alka-Seltzer -- relief for Existential Heartburn.

That side-slipping of the Universes, before the appearance of sentient beings with imagination, was the first form of side-slipping.  The whole universe went as a whole.

With the appearance of somas (incarnate, sentient beings with memory and imagination), a new kind of vortex appeared at 100% probability :  dream-vortices with the dream of autonomy, dream vortices that first perpetuated very primitive, consistent patterns of behavior (instincts), then more complex vortices able to perpetuate adaptive patterns of behavior (learning), and then, with humans, even more complex vortices with sufficient added capacity for attention-memory-imagination (visionary imagining), so that they could exceed learning, dream a new dream, and side-slip individually, in addition to the side-slipping of the local universe, into forms and conditions not ordinarily dominant in their recent local universe.  Another degree of freedom appeared.

At least two orders of Drift exist in any local universe:  (1) Universal Drift (of the whole physical universe limited by the expanding sphere of the "light-front" originating at the Big Flash (thought I was going to say, "Big Bang", didn't you?)) and (2) Individual Drift of the individual vortices (somatic local-consciousnesses) existing within it, as they attune to different probabilities, at first through dreams and memories, and then through deliberate imagination.

Even so, to any of those somas, even as they/we undergo Individual Drift, everything tangible is either 100% or 0%, even if, in mind, things may seem something in between.   (NOTE: never more than 100% -- that's an improper use of "%", sort of like saying, "very unique", when "unique" means "one of a kind").

Within a more stable situation, somas play with probabilities within the scope of their remembered experience of Life.  They play with existing alternatives, known things and known processes, and when they do, they create artifacts that have more-or-less stable existence -- objects of all sorts -- which are gatherings together of some of the "first-order dream" (matter and energy flow) into patterns that reflect and conform to the second-order dream (life-forms) to the third-order dream (conceptions, plans, designs, formulas).  They create things that they keep or leave behind, the way the snail and the nautilus grow their shells as they live, then leave them behind when they die.

But through the encroachment of dreams into the waking state, new information is brought in, new information comes in and shows up as new behaviors and as new artifacts.

In either case, the dream pattern shows up tangibly, in material physical form.


That's a clue about how electro-chemical impulses in the nervous system show up as sensory/mental experience.  Those electro-chemical impulses have a dream-component, the subtle field that shaped (during gestation) and shapes (during life) the organization of the biological person.  There is a field, a "dream field".  It is "the dream of body", or "the dream of soma".  It's an outgrowth of the Universal "first-order dream" of physical reality and the "second-order dream of self-moving life".  The outgrowth is a "super-dream" of somatic vortices, physically existing selves, self-perpetuating, locally conscious (always "here" to ourselves) with memory and the ability carry out, in actions, what is remembered and imagined; a "super-dream" of somatic vortices (conscious, individual selves) in both "sub-" (inanimate) and "super-(animate)", but generally subconscious and subliminal communication with somatic vortices in neighboring universes -- alternate selves, relatively similar or different, more or less accessible from our "local universe", or from more or less similar neighboring universes.  Hence, the unpredictable and sometimes exotic nature of dreams.

The body is dreamed, all its parts are dreamed and remembered in the subtle organizing field, which is what gives pattern to matter and energy (particle and field).  The physicality "remembers" the dream-field, physiologically, not just in the cells, but in the larger patterns of physiological state and behavior.  It's dreamed, and the dream-field that gives rise to 100% actuality is the integrated probability focus of all more-or-less neighboring dream universes, ever-changing in Universal Drift and Individual Drift.  Drifting dream, tangibly congealed and changing.

In cases of physical injury or drastic changes of life, a discontinuity occurs in memory that may displace the individual too far from his or her familiar dream-configuration to return without extraordinary measures -- a kind of amnesia with both physical and psychological manifestations.

Thus, the illusory (dream) nature of existence is the inner side of the material pattern and the material pattern is the outer side of the dream nature of existence.  Both the inner side and the material pattern are at 100% probability --  actual --  the product of the changing equilibrium of Universal Drift and Individual Drift.  For you Buddhists, this is an expansion of the doctrine of Interdependent (or Dependent) Origination.

The dream of self includes a sense of "local hereness" (wherever we are and however fast or slow we move, we are always, "here", to ourselves), a changing field of memory, an encroaching field of imagination (fantasy), a changing field of sensation, and the odd sense that what we are doing is happening "now", even though we sense our actions after they are underway.  (It is the mysterious act of self-initiative, self-direction, and self-correction guided by imagination, enacted via intention, materially actual, and sensed again  -- the feedback between action, sensation and ongoing action -- that gives the illusion of the "now-ness" of our actions and perceptions.)

The dream of self is a dream of movements between rest and activity involving various things and moving in various ways, dreams of accelerating ourselves into action and decelerating into rest -- moving toward things and interacting with them, or away from or around them, avoiding them -- life remembered, more or less, and imagined and enacted, leaving artifacts and evidence behind in an expanding, tangible trail of dreamed influence.

Those acts of acceleration and deceleration constitute a development beyond the Universe's developmental momentum, a new development. In the universe, gravity is an acceleration, but only lifeforms accelerate, decelerate, and accelerate again in new directions, and in more and more ways and more and more degrees -- just as the physical universe is expanding and accelerating in its expansion, as the omni-Universal Dream flowers in Universal Drift, with Individual Drift flowering within it.

Muscle Memory isn't Muscle Memory

Let's get straight to the point:  muscles have no memory that controls their activity.  Muscle memory (more properly, movement memory) resides in the brain, a product of brain-conditioning, i.e., learning.

Patterns of muscular tension result from that conditioning, acquired by learning and by incidents of injury and/or stress.

Think about it:  muscles act in patterns of coordination.  How can any one muscle control the activity of other muscles?  What would be the mechanism?  Willpower?  Telepathy?  And without the ability of a muscle to control other muscles, how could their activity by synchronized in coordinated movement?

No.  Something must centrally control and regulate all muscles to enable coordination, and that something is our nervous systems, the seat of movement memory.

Whether learning to walk or to dance, if you want to change muscle memory, or movement memory, you have to do it by training your nervous system -- and if you're stuck in a tension pattern from an injury, you have to do it by training your nervous system -- by un-learning the dysfunctional pattern and learning a healthy pattern of function, i.e., healthy movement.

MORE:
Completing Your Recovery from an Injury
learning coordination with somatic exercises

Time, Memory, and Eternality

Memory is the confusion of time
(sensation-in-motion or disequilibrium)

with the intuition of the Eternal
(equilibrium) . . . . .
by which we confuse duration
with Eternality . . . . .
so that what we are experiencing now
feels like it is lasting forever
(which is why people need to be reminded of
the Buddhist Doctrine of Impermanence, or "This, too, shall pass.").

The Eternal is our sense of
the asymptotically fine omni-equilibrium

of the Omniverse . . . . .

misinterpreted as Voidness
, Emptiness,
or the Unknowable

but which is just indeterminacy.

The "Eternal" is actually the supremely finely vibrating
dynamic equilibrium
of the fields of all co-existing and interpenetrating local ("parallel") universes.


All local universes are moving disequilibrium (or dynamic equilibrium) processes
appearing as material processes/energy fields
or time, itself,
arising (condensing or precipitating, like weather) out of the ground of being
(or "cloud of Unknowing")
which is that Omni-versal Equilibrium.

Time and "the Eternal" are a continuum,
"not two".


Form is Emptiness and Emptiness is Form.



RELATED:

There is No "Now" Moment -- There is An All-Present Now-Field

Using More of Your Brain

From a certain perspective, we may regard our sense of body as, "complete" -- meaning that we trust we are perceiving things in a "whole" way -- and believe that we don't have gaps or distortions in our perception.

Even if we think that we do -- or do not -- have gaps or distortions in our perception, the experience of having gaps is quite different from what we may think about it.

Having "gaps" is not experienced as "something", but as a "non:thing"; it's the absence of an experience that we don't know isn't there because it's an absence in us, so gaps are commonly missed.

So, it is said that people see things about us that we do not see in ourselves, and roundabout the other way.

Now, it's interesting that the same condition has a corresponding manifestation in the "motor" body (understanding that the notion of "a sensory" and "a motor" body, as "two" is only a device to get us to look at aspects of ourselves; it's not literal.  It's a device.  Really, the two are two aspects of a single experience.)

Back to the "motor" body -- the "motor" body has to do with the physical carrying out of our intentions, producing lingering traces of results in the tangible world.

It also shows up in our Nervous System Neural Network Patterning -- or NSNNP, for short.  This patterning is the collection, the constellation, the array, the 4-dimensional collection of memories, with tendrils of connection to imagination and dreams -- the whole of which has the cohesiveness we call, "ourselves".

That patterning is visible in the way that person holds, contains, and involuntarily maintains tension.  To some degree, our neural network ("NSNNP") is in a state of "SPROINGGG!!!" -- a state of arousal or activation due to the residual effects of intense memories that accumulate in a person.  SPROINGGG is the way the person remains perpetually at-the-ready with his or her competencies and/or emotional reactions; SPROINGGG shapes our character and temperament.

Now, our SPROINGGG is a complex pattern or collection of memories imprinted on our NSNNP.  Memories act as a Strange Attractor -- a time-warp tendency to gravitate toward certain experiences.  So, the complex of memory imprints, the imprint of SPROINGGG on our NSNNP, tends to shape our attention, which attracts us toward or biases us toward certain kinds of experiences.

SPROINGGG is durable; it persists.  The NSNNP, when imprinted by SPROINGGG, tends to keep the SPROINGGG experience as a lasting memory, which then functions as a Strange Attractor/Black Hole (SA/BH) which tends to draw us back to certain experiences.  Again.  And again.  And again.

It's imprinted all the way into, not just the cellular (most shallow) level, but the entire neurological network (NSNNP) which is involved in physiological/psychological checks and balances.  The whole person is affected, as residual SPROINGGG tension shows up as heightened muscular tension -- muscular hypertension -- the objective manifestation of SPROINGGG state (which we experience subjectively).

What, we may ask at this point, might muscular hypertension have to do with vascular hypertension?  Just asking.  Just asking.  It's a little clue.

SPROINGGG tends to appear as a-symmetrical (off-balance) patterns of tension.  That's what makes them disturbing, apart from the fatigue factor SPROINGGG introduces.

Now, just as muscular tensions appear in an asymmetrical way in the physical body, they appear as asymmetrical activation of their nervous system, especially the cerebrum and cerebellum.  (which I speak about at more length in "Two Brains Out of Three", another one of these entries).

SPROINGGG states affect the formation of the neural network in the cerebrum, which participates prominently in moment-to-moment voluntary actions throughout the day (fluid memory or RAM), and also the cerebellum, the repository of long-term, often used, and instinctual action patterns, general templates for action, such as, "How To Turn a Steering Wheel".  They're general templates for movement.  The Hard Drive and The Backup Drive.

Now, what would it be like if one day your computer's hard drive took over the show and started controlling your computer, while your keyboard and mouse responses went unheeded?
Powerless.  Out of control.  Running Amok.

Hmmmm.  Sound familiar?  Having a virus does that.  So does a glitch in your brain-conditioning.

Back spasm.
Awkward balance.
Perpetual crouch.

Yes.  It's true,  Your SPROINGGG imprint on your NSNNP (neural network) is at least partly responsible for whatever state of disarray you are in, and also (very likely) for your chronic physical pains and awkward liabilities.  Yes, it's true.  Your NSNNP integrates both sensations and movement-control patterns (coordination), and SPROINGGG shows up as tight muscles, awkwardness, and in-coordination.  Think Jerry Lewis.

Your hard drive is running amok.  We must veer away from SAs (Strange Attractors) .  However, since SAs are both strange and very attractive, you have three options:  (1) attempt to escape whatever SA you are (like Charibdis) nearby (2) go for it -- head straight into the SA/BH, or (3), alternate going into and pulling away from that "nearby SA" until you pop out of it, now newly being in control of your own NSNNP.  You are in the command seat and the NSNNP is doing your bidding, using general template patterns resident in your cerebellum and "steering" them with your moment-to-moment awareness and voluntary control.

You see?

But your NSNNP functions somewhat erratically due to your NSNNP being asymmetrically activated.

Zo.  You must learn new, better-balanced movement.

And once you learned better-balanced movement, you must let go of that balanced pattern, too, to have freedom -- necessarily so, for you must be able to move freely between activity and rest.

Now, how do we go about imprinting patterns?  And isn't that brainwashing?

Ah, if only brainwashing were what the word implies.

No, this is true brainwashing -- self-washing of your NSNNP of residual SPROINGGG.

ahH HAH!  I knew it!

It's like this:  the first step of activating the neural net is, in little humans, gross motor control, primitive movement.  Then, movements get refined as the NSNNP develops more and more internal inter-connections as it integrates the sensations and movement patterns that repeat the most and/or have more intensity.  Stimulation patterns show up as network integrations and memory imprints, both healthy and SPROINGGG, accessible, in large measure, through patterns of movement that show up as patterns of sensation (memory).

And so it goes.

The way Out is In.  Remember diving into the SA/BH?  Well, there are both sensory-motor and memory/imagination techniques.  Here's one.

Tha' tha' that's all, for now, folks!

SEE SOMATIC EXERCISES THAT ACTIVATE AND BALANCE BRAIN FUNCTION

Two Brains out of Three


or 
Understanding Your Great-Grandparents
© 2006 Lawrence Gold
          The field of brain research has progressed remarkably over the past few decades.  Despite that fact, many people remain ignorant of the basics of brain functioning – essential information for those who intend to use their brain beyond middle age.  This article is to bring you up to speed on some of the discoveries of brain research and to correlate these discoveries with facets of your own life, so that you can understand, when you have gone wrong, where you have gone wrong and why, not to mention, how, or with whom.

          It should be understood, first of all, that your brain has what researchers refer to as “plasticity.”  To say that your brain has plasticity is not to say that your brain is made of plastic.  While that is true of Barbie and Ken, some politicians and certain news commentators, it is not true of you.  No, the term, “plasticity,” refers to your brain’s capacity for reshaping the way it functions – its adaptability.

          This is an important point.  It means that people have tremendous variability in how they go about doing things and in what kinds of things they can do. You’ve heard the saying, “He couldn’t think and chew gum at the same time.”  That’s what I’m talking about.  Some people can think and chew gum at the same time, and some people can think and chew more than one kind of gum at the same time.  Others can even type.

          Which leads us to my secretary – who stands as an important exception to this observation, being a blonde.  Actually, I don’t have a secretary.



          Back to your brain.  Anatomists found long ago that the brain of vertebrates (animals with backbones) has three major parts.  Perhaps you have seen pictures of them.  These are the brain stem, the cerebrum, and the cerebellum.

          The brain stem, as the name implies, is associated with plant-like functions – breathing, digestion, sensitivity to light – functions that are ongoing automatically, the so-called autonomic functions.  Now, I know that plants don’t have lungs, but they do breathe through the leaves, taking in carbon dioxide and sending out oxygen (the opposite of what animals do); they do take in nourishment through the roots (in a way similar to how our intestines do it), and they do turn toward sources of light.  That qualifies.  Your brain stem is associated with vegetative functions and your interior life.

          Your cerebrum is associated with moment-to-moment, immediate responsiveness to things – emotions, memories, movements, and sensations.  It is the brain-center of action in the outside world.  In the human, the cerebrum is especially associated with thinking, with learning, and with a sense of humor (which is the recognition of the unexpected results that come from certain actions).  The sense of humor, particularly, is a higher brain function, and is lacking in some people.  Many attempts have been made at humor transplants, and they have, in general, failed, probably because of the confusion some people have about intended vs. non-intended results.  You may be confused about this point, yourself.  I’ll clarify, but first I have to confuse you, some more.

          The cerebrum, frankly, is what most people think of as the brain.  It’s big, it’s gray, and it’s covered with wrinkles, kind of how your great-grandfather seemed to you when you were little.  These wrinkles have a special purpose; they increase the surface area of your brain so more brain cells can fit in.  These wrinkles are called, “rugae,” by medical scientists.  The word, “rugae,” comes from the same word-root as the word, “corrugated,” which Webster’s 

Thesaurus defines as

ridged, grooved, furrowed, folded, fluted, roughened, creased, wrinkled, flexed, crinkled, crumpled, puckered
Your brain is puckered, or if you like, corrugated.  Your brain isn’t exactly a cardboard box, but you get the idea.  (In that case, what does “thinking outside the box” really mean?  Where is the box?  In your brain??)

          Now, your cerebellum is associated with the coordination of muscles and movement.  The word, “cerebellum,” means “beautiful brain,” which is odd because whereas the cerebrum is wrinkled (like your great-grandfather), the cerebellum is even more wrinkled (like your great-grandmother).  If your cerebrum has about as many wrinkles as your face, your cerebellum has about as many wrinkles as your fingerprints.  Where learning is concerned, more wrinkles means more brain cells and more storage capacity for learning.  This makes sense, if you think about it. 

          Where your cerebrum controls actions, your cerebellum contains the know-how to carry them out without your thinking about it.  Your cerebrum is always telling your cerebellum what to do and your cerebellum is always coming back with an action, and not always the right one.  Think about all your good intentions.

          To understand this relationship better, let’s think about typographical errors.  When you learn to type, you learn to type words by striking keys in a certain sequence.  First, you learn where the letters are on the keyboard, then you learn to strike them in sequence to type the word, “the,” for example (people with dyslexia may prefer the word, “cat”, which refers to something you can actually see.  Dyslexics have trouble understanding words about things they can’t see.)  Then, the mere intention to type the word, “the,” results in your typing the word, “and”.  Why is this?  It’s because you weren’t paying enough attention to your typing and since both words contain three letters, involve similar rhythms in typing them, and are used with about the same degree of frequency, your intention to type the word, “the” (sent from your cerebrum to your cerebellum), resulted in your cerebellum causing you to type the word, “and,” which was close, but no cigar. 

This explains many of the arguments between your great-grandmother (who sent your great-grandfather out to the corner store for cream) and your great-grandfather (who came back with a newspaper and a cigar).  Your great-grandfather had a routine:  walk to the corner store for a newspaper and a cigar; your great-grandmother had a different agenda.  Somewhere along the way, your great-grandfather got distracted and went into his routine.  He didn’t do it on purpose.  Maybe it was partly your great-grandmother’s fault for not making sure she had his attention to begin with, maybe it’s just that he was set in his ways.  Maybe both.

          Anyway, you get my point.  The cerebellum has routines and the cerebrum triggers them.  Your cerebrum doesn’t (you don’t) usually monitor every detail of every action; it triggers (you trigger) the whole action and then it fine-tunes (you fine-tune) it, so you don’t always make a left turn the same way and sometimes end up in the bushes.  Otherwise, your great-grandmother might as well have gone and gotten the cream, herself.  Sometimes, the result is a newspaper and a cigar.  It probably would have been better if she had gone with him to make sure he didn’t get off track, and the same is true of how to avoid typographical errors.  Enough attention is needed when doing a learned action to keep the cerebellum on track.

          Now, your great-grandfather learned a lot of routines over his lifetime and your great-grandmother liked some of them (running errands) and put up with others (cigars).  The reason she put up with those others is because they were automatic and it was too much trouble to try to change them, even if they were not quite to her liking.

          And so, we have described both your great-grandparents’ relationship and how your brain works.

          Let me highlight, again, a certain point:  Your cerebellum/great-grandfather learned his routines.  They didn’t just come out of the ground.  Some of those routines suited your great-grandmother; others didn’t, and at a certain point, she just accepted them as inevitable, even though they were just learned behaviors and an old dog can learn new tricks, if he wants to.

          The problem with most people is that there is a communication breakdown within their own brain – their intentions don’t always get the desired action and they just accept the breakdown as inevitable.  They think they’re getting old, when really they’ve just learned some routines that interfere with other routines.  Result – a slowdown, a breakdown, or just lots of wasted effort.

          Let’s talk specifics.

          There are three basic ways we learn routines:  by example, by deliberate cultivation, and by accident.

By Example

          When you were a baby, you learned to walk.  You learned the basics of standing up and your first steps by yourself and over time you learned styles of movement from your family.  You did it by spontaneous imitation.  Family members tend to develop similar movement patterns and similar posture by example.  This is true to such an extent that people in later life attribute their aches and pains to heredity, rather than recognizing that they learned movement and posture from their family, patterns that may persist for a lifetime.

          It should be understood, by the way, that many if not most aches and pains come from muscular tension learned and maintained by the cerebellum as movement routines (routine ways of moving, routine patterns of tension).  These routines control posture and movement, and routines that involve too much muscular tension cause pain.  In a sense, people hurt themselves.

By Deliberate Cultivation

          In general, the movement routines learned by example set the foundation for new movement routines learned by deliberate cultivation.  That means, for example, that a person’s way of walking (learned by example from the family) forms the foundation for their way of running and affects their performance in all sports.  Dorkiness runs in the family.  Snootiness runs in the family.  Uptightness runs in the family – to the seventh generation. 

          Among elite athletes we see cultivation of more efficient movement routines, and this cultivation involves learning and self-correction.  Even this kind of cultivation (learning which takes advantage of the brain’s plasticity) often leaves movement routines learned by example intact, which accounts for the unnecessarily high frequency of injuries among athletes and dancers.

          Cultivation of movement patterns occurs automatically whenever we do something regularly.  Auto mechanics, beauticians and computer-workers acquire movement patterns from their work just as dancers and athletes do from their disciplines.  Repetition creates lasting routines, which explain the differing kinds of occupational injuries found in different types of work.

          While these cultivated movement patterns have their place, if they get overcultivated, they create problems.  There’s a story about Smokey the Bear.  Every time his mate said, “I’m feeling hot, tonight, dear,” he went and got his shovel and went to look for a fire to put out.

By Accident

          This category of learning accounts for the infirmities of aging so often taken as inevitable – lingering pain, stiffness, general decrepitude.

          “By accident” means by accident.  You turn an ankle, you have a car accident, you fall skiing, the pain of the injury causes you to tighten up around the painful area.  You shift your weight and your movements to avoid pain.  Pretty soon, you have a new movement routine.

          A subtler form of accidental routine formation is stress.  Stress leads to tension.  Long-term tension leads to tension as a routine state.

          A lifetime of injuries (whether or not bones were broken) and stress leads to a lifetime of accumulated movement routines, one on top of the other.  No wonder people become decrepit as they age.  Never mind heredity; your history of injuries and stress alone is sufficient to create lingering pains that make you feel old.

Your Body isn’t Broken; Your Brain has Too Many Routines Going On at Once

          The pile-up of routines accumulated from learning-by-example, deliberate cultivation, and accidents leads to internal conflicts, experienced mentally as confusion and physically as awkwardness and heaviness of movement (tiredness).  Your movements have “typographical errors”.

          In Real Estate, there is the concept, “deferred maintenance.”  It refers to all the things in a building that have broken down that have just been left unrepaired “until later.”  “Deferred maintenance” lowers property value.  People have deferred maintenance, too.  Too much deferred maintenance, and people look like a structure that’s about to collapse.  Think of very, very old people.

          You’ve got to catch up on all this deferred maintenance.  You’ve got to sort out all those movement routines accumulated from stress and injuries that have already healed and end those that have outlived their usefulness.  That’s a job, in itself, but a necessary one.

          It’s not really a repair job that you need, however, but debugging.

          In computers, debugging refers to removing errors in programming and the junk residue of obsolete data and programs that once were installed and later removed, but left behind fragments that slow computer performance and cause crashes.

          Your brain is “bugged,” and you’re feeling it bodily.  That’s where you’ve gone wrong (and maybe where you’ve never gone right).

          There is a way to debug your brain:  unlearn the habitual routines that no longer serve (first step:  by becoming specifically aware of them as sensations) and learn more efficient routines (by practice).  You’ve got to get your great-grandfather to listen to your great-grandmother. 

          This kind of statement is problematic in a piece of writing like this because most people haven’t a clue, from personal experience, of what it means.  So let’s try a little example.

          A sneaky technique for getting your great-grandfather to change his routine is to have your great-grandmother say, “Dear, why don’t you go down to the corner store for a newspaper and a cigar, and while you’re there, pick up some cream.”  He’ll be walking to the corner store thinking, “newspaper, cigar, cream … newspaper, cigar, cream.”
          Somatic education techniques employ a similar strategy.  It’s a truism that we don’t know what we’ve got (or had) until it’s gone, so the terms “habitual routine” and “more efficient action” have little meaning in the words, themselves.  Sorry.  So think of it this way:  take care of your deferred maintenance; debug your brain.  Get help from a movement (preferably somatic) educator and you’ll know the difference.  Don’t end up like your great-grandparents.

Presenting Somatics

Ladies and Gentlemen:
for your edification and entertainment
may I present

somatics

an evolutionary leap
in the understanding of humankind

This kind of stunt happens only every ten thousand years, or so, so listen up.  I'm going to lay a metaphor on you. 

The early stages of life were little more than separation of inner from outer by a cell membrane, with some chemical exchange and a sense of bouncy motion.

Later came light sensitivity and then, eyes, signifying the entire orientation of the next few hundred million years, or so -- the orientation to what is external.  Most of evolutionary history has been taken up with that task, at first in the name of bare survival, then in the name of cultural and social development (beyond bare survival).  The external orientation shows up today with the use of make-up (which simulates the facial coloring changes of sexual arousal).

Only recently (in terms that changed the face of Western culture) has internal awareness been developing; in earlier times, individuals rarely developed much subtle internal awareness, being more preoccupied, as they were, with challenging living conditions and social conformity pressures (both internal and external).  Individual impulses were contained within and by conformist conditioning.

So, the inner is coming into its own, ready to be correlated with the outer.

"Correlated"  -- what does this mean?

It means seeing the correspondences between inner (subjective) experience and outer (objective) behavior or physical changes as two experiences of the same thing.  Not "thinking of them" as the same thing, not thinking "We're supposed to think of them as the same thing."  Actually experiencing them as the same thing, considered differently.

So, "outer is experienced inwardly" and inward experience shows up as outward behaviors or changes.

Then comes the lie detector test.

Just kidding.

Here's some examples, instead.

Dreams are inward events, right?

Ever seen a dog dream?  The waving paws, the changes of breathing, the barking?  See the eyes move back and forth?

They call that REM -- Rapid  Eye Movement.  It's  reliable sign of dreaming.  The outer behavior that corresponds to doggie's inner experience.

Ever watched someone learn to read?  The lip movements?

You're seeing them thinking the words as they sound them.

Ever blushed?

Point made?

So, somatics is based on inner and outer being two aspects of the same thing, not two different things.

First of all, for reasons stated, that alone is an evolutionary leap in the understanding of humankind.

But wait!  There's more.

Those primitive life-forms at the dawn of time, those cells floating in a primordial soup, were very simple.  They had three functions:  eat, excrete, and reproduce.  They enjoyed it, but still, that's all they had.

Later down the line, they developed a fashion sense.

My point is that as life evolved, life forms became more intricate, more organized, capable of more and different forms of behavior.  Most of these behaviors are what would call "instinctual" -- meaning intrinsic to the organism and, for the most part, constituting all of its behavior -- the behavioral patterns of bugs and worms, a reptile or two, maybe a fish.

The higher we go up the evolutionary staircase (fooled you -- you thought I was going to say, "ladder", didn't you?), and the more complex life forms are, the more complex their behavior gets, and something new appears -- the ability to learn more.  Dogs, rats, bankers.

Now, learning is a big deal.  It involves self-loading new behaviors and new perceptions into the Automatic Memory Library for use in day to day living.  Any life-form can learn by repetitive experiences of something -- but how many life-forms self-load new learning?  I ask you.

That's another evolutionary leap.

But wait! There's more!

Sometimes conditions change to such an extent that previous learning no longer closely applies.  What do you do, then?

Learning something new on top of old learning is like playing two pieces of music at the same time.  Moreover, one generally finds it impossible to turn off Song #1.

Good grooming suggests an alternative.  Learn to turn off Song #1, or at least to modulate it.

How?  You've got to switch it from "autoplay" to "manual launch".  And to do that, you've got to switch yourself to "manual launch" and then manually re-launch Song #1.  Now that you know what it feels like to launch Song #1, you also know what it feels like not to launch Song #1 -- and there you are.  STOP PLAYING SONG #1!!  You think I'm being funny?  No.  I'm using a metaphor to explain a principle.  I'll explain, how, later.

For now, let's assume that you've stopped playing Song #1 and things are quiet enough that you can hear yourself think.  You can play Song #2 without interference.

That's it, in principle.

In other language:  Wash before you handle food.

What does this have to do with somatics?

I would think that would be obvious.  But if it's not, here goes.

Our lives are a gigantic recording library of events and behaviors, input from earliest consciousness, grown into maturity, or something similar to maturity.

Life is constantly playing Song #2, while we continue to play Song #1 (to a greater or lesser degree).  By time we get to Song #2, Life expects us to learn Song #3.  It's always something.

We're on a rolling landslide of cultural norms, so Song #1 is definitely on the playlist, as is Song #2 and, of course, Song #3.
 
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to bring songs under control, at least some of the time?  Maybe clear out a little memory space so we can meet experience afresh, learn the next song more adroitly?

That's one of the basic understandings of somatics:  free the grip of old "songs" so that we can dance to the new songs better.  In other language:  Out with the old, in with the new. 

The question of "How" enters the picture.

Here's the basic approach:

Whatever a person is doing "wrong"
(causing problems for self or others) -- 
have him (her) do it more --
and then less.

The "more" part heightens awareness.
The "less" part activates responsibility.

Sounds like fun, huh?

This strategy works with physical pains, emotional distress, and stupid thinking.

It's a basic strategem of somatics, and if you don't like it, try drugs -- the legal kind, of course.  (Oh, no, I would never advocate the use of psychoactive drugs -- you know, the kind that expand your reach beyond conventional thinking!  oh, no ... not I.)

Which brings us to another principle, which I call "The Prime Directive of Somatics":

Ya Gotta Wanna.

If you don' wanna, you don'a get so much done.

I heard that, once.

The field of somatics observes certain principles and from those principles develops courses of action that free individuals from old songs so they can learn new ones and maybe a new act or two.  Of course, ya gotta wanna.

Here's another way of saying the same thing:
There is No Mind-Body Connection | There Is No Mind-Body Split
Pain Relief through Somatic Education 

Practical Action:
Programs