Why are all notions of good posture grossly incomplete and obsolete?
They're incomplete because they apply to a non-moving position -- and life is altogether about movement. If it isn't moving, it's dead.
So, to take "spinal curves", for example, the lower-back (or lumbar) curve exists to distribute the weights above (chest, shoulders and head) and below (pelvis and legs) for balance. When you bend over to pick something up, your curve changes. If it doesn't change, you're stiff.
Balance-in-movement is the overriding "imperative" (or necessary purpose) of all posture; balance is what makes possible all other actions. If you're out of balance, you're unstable -- and then what happens to you, whichever movement or activity you are involved in? Your curves change continually, as you move, to maintain easy balance.
This is not to say that there's no such thing as too much or too little curvature in the spine. There are such things -- but they can't be corrected by adjustments or by holding on to "good posture". Adjustments don't last and holding on to good posture doesn't lend itself to good movement. You can't go through life holding on to "good posture"; as soon as your attention goes to something else, you forget about posture. So, that approach is entirely impractical.
That's why notions of "good posture" are obsolete.
What's the alternative?
Good movement. Good movement takes care of good posture, automatically.
Improving Movement ("Muscle") Memory
Good movement isn't something that you maintain by moment to moment discipline, by efforts to maintain good movement. That's no more practical than holding on to "good posture". Good movement is "good movement memory" -- done automatically and fine-tuned by the movements of the moment.
How do you develop good movement memory? You develop it the same way as you develop any other memory: repeated experience until the memory forms. It's a temporary discipline.
It's also a discipline that few undertake. With movement, as with most other activities, most people stop developing with the minimum learning needed to get by, just as with handwriting, cooking -- and walking.
Next time you're out in public, watch people walk. How few are a pleasure to watch! Many people lumber; some plod; some bounce; many lean to one side or come down heavier on one side than the other -- or come down heavy on each side, as they walk. So many are ungainly -- and it isn't genetic; it's movement memory.
Few efforts to improve movement memory work. Most involve stretching and strengthening. Just try stretching or strengthening any other kind of memory and see how far you get, changing it.
To be fair, let's look at each: stretching and strengthening.
Stretching
Stretching muscles generally involves pitting one muscle group against another -- even the muscles of one person against the muscles of another (as in assisted stretching, massage, or professional adjustments).
The experience is generally uncomfortable and, if at all successful, is only temporarily so. Old muscular tensions (and posture) reappear in short order. (That's why there's a term, "chiropractic lifestyle".) So, movement memory isn't changed, but only temporarily overpowered.
Now, apply that to other kinds of memory. Think of an unpleasant memory. I'm not suggesting this to torture you, but to illustrated a point more quickly.
Stretching an unpleasant memory would be like trying to avoid remembering it -- or practicing denial. How effective is that? You tend to react the same old way in a similar situation, don't you.There's always a strain, isn't there?
Movement memory is just that: the memory of the feeling of a movement (how to move) that controls action.
If you want to change movement memory, you need another approach, one that deals with memory the way memory actually works. I'll get to that once I've dealt with strengthening.
Strengthening
Strengthening muscles to improve posture means only one thing: that those muscles aren't strong enough to overpower their opposing muscle groups, which are always tight.
Generally, those "weaker" muscles aren't really weaker, but just tired from working against their opposing muscles. They don't need strengthening, but refreshment -- and that refreshment is possible only when their opposing muscles relax from being tight all the time.
Another effect of muscles being held tight (by movement memory) is that your brain causes their opposing muscles to slacken to allow the tight muscles to cause movement without counter-interference. We feel that slackening as weakness, but it isn't weakness; it's how coordination works. Although strengthening muscles to improve posture may be meant to work against that, it doesn't work.
By the way, tight muscles are usually ticklish, sore to pressure, or painful from muscle fatigue -- so, you've got painful muscles on one side and "weak" (tired) muscles on the other. Tight muscles drag you out of good posture and that make good posturing tiring.
Do you think you're going to strengthen muscles to correct your posture and have it stay "corrected" under those conditions? You'll only make them tighter and sore -- and make yourself stiffer.
Good posture is natural only as a condition of freely coordinated balance, not as a condition of effort (which you can't maintain under ordinary conditions of life because you can't continually pay attention, to it). You've got to free the tight muscles, not make the tired muscles stronger.
Now, let's take on memory in terms of strengthening.
That would be like trying to convince yourself that things happened differently than they did, that the old memory wan't real. That's known as self-deception. You can work really hard to convince yourself, but how effective is that? You will still tend to have stress and strain in that area of life, won't you?
So, we've dispensed with stretching and strengthening as approaches to good posture (because they don't effectively deal with movement memory) and with the standard notion of good posture, itself.
We're in the home stretch, now (pun recognized!)
Improving Movement ("muscle") Memory
By, "improving", I mean "developing a more satisfactory experience of something".
A more satisfactory experience of movement memory is a more satisfactory experience of movement -- both in terms of comfort and in terms of motion or action.
There's an alternative to stretching or strengthening that's entirely natural and that everybody's experienced in a simple form. It involves relaxation, rather than stretching, and refreshment, rather than strengthening. It's called, "pandiculation".
I'll let the video tell and show you, about it. Click, below:
If you want good posture, learn pandiculation to free yourself of muscle tensions that drag you down, out of good posture, and that make good posture tiring. Learn pandiculation to make good posture natural. Learn pandiculation to refresh yourself. Learn pandiculation.
So, that's why all notions of good posture are grossly incomplete and obsolete -- and what you can do that feels better and works better at making good posture easy and natural.
Lawrence Gold has practiced clinical somatic education professionally since 1990, with a world-wide clientele composed generally of people needing to get out of pain. All of his clients end up with better posture and movement, along with being pain-free. You can free the tight muscles that drag you down, by yourself, with the general program of somatic education (pandiculation) exercises called, The Cat Stretch Exercises (involves neither a cat, nor stretching).
This article is reprinted from Somatics on the Web (https://somatics.com/wordpress/2052-2/), by the author.
eople need to use more of their intelligence a lot better if
we are to avoid a civilization crash -- a crash starting with the consequences
of overpopulation -- pollution, wars, crime, economic fluctuations and crashes,
overfishing of the oceans, deforestation, and others, and continuing with climate
shifts and a likely crisis of agriculture (declining food quality and quantity).
Human civilization, as a whole, needs to rehabilitate the
truth-sense -- and that means both recognizing the ring of truth and
recognizing (and allowing) the sense of mystery that signals us when we
really don't know what's what. We need both -- equally --for
reasons I explain, here.
People are bogged down in everything we think we know and one
symptom is that our ability to pay attention has been reduced.People are chronically disturbed by what's
inside and distracted by what's outside, and that's called "ADD" and
"ADHD".
The problems facing civilization have been compounded by
people's inability (and unwillingness) to take in new information, and that has
to do with more than just the "information glut"; it has to do with a
slowed-down "attention refreshment rate" -- the ability to clear the
mind.It's both. I'll explain that, too.
This piece is about what keeps human civilization bogged
down and what it will take, most basically, to stop and to reverse a
"civilization nosedive" (and planetary calamity).I'm not being presumptuous.I'm being starkly truthful.
USING our INTELLIGENCE BETTER
Now, by, "intelligence", I don't mean,
"intellect". Those are not the
same."Intellect", as it
commonly appears, these days, is just the ability to link concepts together and
put words (or symbols) to them.Nothing
about intellect guarantees wisdom -- the truth-sense that underlies the ability
to generate and sustain well-being.
TRUTH-SENSE
There are four aspects (factors) of intelligence, upon which
the truth-sense depends:
imagination | intention | memory | attention
They inter-relate, like this:
Now, that may be a lot to swallow. It's rather big.Just put your attention on each of the
word-sets and notice how the meanings interconnect. If you don't just jump to your "mental definitions", but experience the feelings of the meanings, this diagram will inform your
intuition and make sense.
The Truth-Sense depends upon all four.Without all four operating and well-integrated
with each other, ideas of "truth" get reduced to words and facts of a
narrowed significance that doesn't take the broad realities of the world into
account; the truth-sense gets distorted or faint, leading to multiple problems
-- and I'll say plenty about that as we get into this piece.
So, intellect, the "coin-of-the-realm" of our
technological society, these days, is often deficient in
"truth-sense" and has gone astray -- and I'll say more about that,
too.
For now, I'm just going to launch into a series a points
that show how our educational approaches and habits of technology have put civilization
in jeopardy -- and offer a way out that MUST be taken if we are to bring our
civilization out of a nosedive.
HOW HUMAN SUCCESS HAS LED TO A CRISIS OF CIVILIZATION
From the heading to this section, you may think that what
follows is going to be obvious; I think you'll be surprised -- both by the
origin of the massive problems we face and by the basic, required solution.
I'll be specific.
Three Advantages Tempt
Toward Three Pitfalls
Three evolutionary developments have led to the success of
humanity as a species. In their extreme states of development, they've gone in
an unbalanced direction and have now made humanity a hazard to ourselves as a
species and a danger to the rest of the earth's living life-support system.
Those three evolutionary developments are memory, language,
and products of "the hand" (technology and art).
They worked for a time in human history.Now, they are out of balance in ways that I
will recognizably describe.
Humanity faces a crisis of integrity.
Integrity
The way I mean, INTEGRITY, is not the usual sense confused
with "honesty".I mean it in
the purest sense of the term: the sense of "something recognizable being
there -- something that holds together and can withstand participating in experience".
Integrity is just a matter of things working together to do
what they can't do, by themselves.
As an example, an airplane consists of parts put together.
Without the "together" part, we don't have an airplane; what we have
is a pile of parts.
An airplane is said to have "structural integrity"
if it can keep together and function under a range of conditions.If, in a test flight, it breaks apart, it's
said to have lost structural integrity.Integrity means, "wholeness".
When you remember anything, you're remembering an
arrangement, the wholeness of which looks like the thing you're remembering and
which persists through some span of time.
Memory
What follows isn't just for you to memorize or
intellectually to understand. This isn't a high school or college course where
you get a grade for remembering something you've been told. It's for you to "locate" in
yourself, as a set of experiences that everybody has.
The way most people regard memory is:
REMEMBERING +
INTEGRITY + PERSISTENCE
+
REMEMBERING +
PERSISTENCE + INTEGRITY
You may not have thought about it, but if you consider it,
you'll see it's so, in your case.
That formulation leaves the impression of three ingredients
of memory, doesn't it?But, when we
remember things, we remember whole things, not "ingredients".
I'd like to present a different way of looking at memory
(again, four factors):
ATTENDING to REMEMBERING
* INTEGRITY * PERSISTING
[ * = "TIMES", AS IN
MULTIPLCATION ]
REMEMBERING *
PERSISTING ATTENDING to * INTEGRITY
The "times" symbols ( " * " ) are
deliberate and may bewilder you; you're just not used to them. They signify,
"transformation", not "addition" ( " + " ) -- not
"the collection of ingredients", anymore, but something new.
That "sense of something new" requires you to let
go of remembering the ingredients, to take a fresh look at that "something
new".A cake is different from a
collection of ingredients; it's the transformation of those ingredients into
something new.
You can't imagine the cake that's going to come out of a new
recipe, in advance.You may know the new
ingredients, but the cake that will come from them is unknown.
Memory, alone, leaves reality incomplete.Memory, alone, is an incomplete view of
reality.
That said, the development of memory and the
acquisition of knowledge have been an obvious advantage to humanity's
development of civilization and is now becoming a gigantic disadvantage.
Knowledge Has
Gotten Too Big for Its Britches.
Things change.Everything that we remember is "the way that it was."
We have no certainty, no assurance, that the way anything was is the way that
it is or will continue to be.
To assert that the way something was is the way it is,
is to misrepresent our degree knowledge. It may or may not be so.
But people everywhere represent that they know more than
they actually do.There's a reason, for
that, that I will get into.
This cultural habit of clinging to the appearance of being,
"a knower", has led to humanity being bound up in ways of perceiving,
thinking and acting that have led to chronic conflict and failure to change
with the necessities of the times.
It interferes even with efforts to seek knowledge to
overcome problems.Even in the face of
new knowledge, people go for the familiar.That's how advertising works: by making what is new seem familiar. People go for "the familiar".
Not surprising -- but there's a deeper problem:
Education
Perpetuated Civilization -- and is Now Bringing it Down.
Education is the foundation of civilization and its
continuance from generation to generation. Education, the way it's been done, is
relies heavily upon memory.
While that seems inevitable and necessary and to have worked
for most of human history, the way it's been done is not sufficient, anymore.
Memory-dominant education has a gigantic pitfall that didn't
become obvious until the knowledge-base of humanity became too great for any
one individual to contain, until the world population grew so large that different
cultures had to interact with each other, and until human technology because a
dominant force accelerating cultural change faster than people could keep up.
People are drowning in memories -- and don't even know or
recognize it.
The Pitfall
All new developments of culture come in through "the
imagination channel" -- art ("the beautiful"), morality ("the
good"), and technology ("the true") -- and there's the rub: two
things can't occupy the same space at the same time.When memory dominates, imagination recedes.
Knowledge and tradition that at first kept things aloft are now ballast.
Education and Pride
in Knowing
The "educational" orientation teaches people
"pride in knowing".Along with
that goes, "shame in not-knowing" or fear of not knowing or fear of
being wrong.
Accordingly, people become conceited about their knowledge
-- and unreceptive to new understandings, particularly breakthroughs that alter
their understanding (and the apparent validity) of current knowledge.
People become resistant to (or uncomfortable with) change
because change ALWAYS involves a temporary state of not-knowing (which I call,
"Being in The Zone of Incomprehensibility").In other words, when people cling to
"the old", nothing new can come in.That state defeats (or impedes) the recognition of new developments --
and the emergence of new understanding.
So, one of the side-effects of the current
"educational" orientation is apparent (learned) stupidity.
The fundamental requirement of emerging insight and
understanding is a sense (or a tolerance) of mystery, of simple not-knowing
(not mystery of the spooky kind). Mystery is a kind of mental "space"
into which new understanding emerges.The sense of curiosity attracts new things to fill it; it's a hunger.
Curiosity is an appetite the way hunger is an appetite. Curiosity depends on mystery.
When the sense of knowing dominates the sense of mystery,
nothing new can come in. "The appetite is satisfied."
Knowledge overshadowing the sense of mystery defeats or
impedes all human development -- all human development. The satisfied
appetite hopes things won't change, so it can continue to be satisfied. People
want to keep their money, their self-image, and their social status. (That's the original meaning of the political
term, "conservative".)
People Seem
Reasonably Intelligent ...
Memory gives the illusion of intelligence.Observe people's behavior in public places,
such as restaurants and entertainment venues.Generally, people seem reasonable, normal, and for the most part,
reasonably intelligent.That's because
they "know the rules" of their situation -- and know how to play by
them -- or break them.
Even rough-hewn individuals may seem reasonably intelligent
-- some of the time. That's a sign that people have become used to a low
standard of intelligence and of decorum (behavior).
But that's not intelligence; that's memory in action.Memory just makes things seem reliable.
When Things Change,
However . . .
What does someone who operates from memory do when
"something happens"? They consult memory for what to do.Conventional thinking.
Put people into an unfamiliar, or more open-ended,
circumstance (such as a political campaign, a political rally, a political
office -- or a job promotion or relocation). They lose their bearings and you notice
how unintelligent they (you) feel.
Now, I'm going to use a "charged" term, and so I
need to tell you what I mean, by it. The term is, "idiocy".As I define it, "idiocy" is,
"an automatic, habitual, detrimental action not appropriate to the
situation". It's not just an insult; it's a technical term.
Idiocy shows up in
the
pomp that surrounds government and political activities
Government is supposed to be a matter of public service.That makes pomp a form of idiocy.
consumerism
and endless economic growth (beyond planetary capacity)
unregulated
pollution (goes with consumerism and population growth)
tax
cuts for the wealthy and unlimited wealth acquisition (which leads to
economic system "diabetes" and self-anaesthetizing addictions of
numerous sorts)
Trickle-Down
Theory (depends upon the wealthy wanting it to trickle down)
market
(and bank) deregulation (which lead to economic "obesity" -- fat
cats)
Conventional thinking is approximate, sometimes, very
approximate.Going by conventional
thinking (memory -- "We've always done it that way" or "That's
standard operating procedure," or "That would be the standard of
practice") can and does tend toward idiotic behavior all over the place --
where people substitute, "can't" for "won't".
What people should do is cultivate all four factors,
in themselves so that, while accumulated memory helps them recognize
something about a situation, continued attention stimulates imagination
that arouses an intention better fitting to that situation -- than
to the situation remembered.
attend * recognize * imagine * intend
It's fine-tuning that is possible when all four factors of
intelligence are accessible and well-integrated, for the individual, when the
individual's intelligence isn't being confined to memory.Otherwise, we have a dunderheaded individual
who is like steering out of alignment or like a stick through the spokes of a
wheel.
Ring a bell?
Scientific
Knowledge is Real Knowledge?
Scientific knowledge is only approximate.That's why science requires multiple
measurements of anything and why "rounding" is used.That's why engineering speaks in terms of
"tolerances"; ask the engineers who designed the Space Shuttle.Any measurement (the mainstay of science) is
approximate; ask any astronomer. Error is "built in" to measurement;
that's why the term, "margin of error" is used.
So engineers and scientists get used to accepting
"relative certainty" as "practically absolute certainty, where a
margin of tolerance or error is involved. It's an artificial certainty used as
a "go" signal. It becomes an aggressive conventional attitude, that
something approximately known is certainly known.
Feel the attitude.Familiar?
Quantum physicists devised an experiment related to
computing in which they discovered that the behavior of two interrelated
systems can be predicted at most 85% of the time.The 15% is unknown.
So, to assume the sufficiency of memory for predicting new
experiences is a case of "knowledge being too big for its britches."
Even Measurement is
only Approximate.
"Measurement" is the basis of science -- but every
scientist and every engineer knows that measurement always involves some degree
of error, called, "measurement error."Tolerances for error are always built into
design specifications.
By disregarding measurement errors, technologists discard
the portion of Mystery that exists in every calculation.They disregard the margin of error part and
assume knowledge, based on the rest -- knowledge good enough for action, good
enough to make a product that will perform adequately.
But measurement errors are always there.That's why product warranties exist.
The Seeming
Solidity of Experience is the Experience of Your Own Mental Solidity. The sense of "solidity" is what makes a memory seem reliable
and correct -- whether or not it happens to be reliable or correct.The solidity exists, not in the event or
object, but in your sense of memory.The
solidity of your memory provides a relatively fixed attention-point for pegging
an experience.It's not the experience
that you experience as, "solid", but your own four-factor
intelligence.
attending to the appearance of it having a persistent intention toward it
Feel that?
Your perception is approximate, and so is your sense of the
reality of anything.But it seems true
and reliable because you override the uncertainty of your "margin of
error".
If you really "get" that, if you get how the words,
above, connect, that recognition changes your mind from "hard
certainty" about apparently objective reality to a recognition that the
"hardness" is you. You may then intuit the "portion" of Mystery
that exceeds hard science and technology."Your elevator" might not work
right, for all time!There's the
possibility of "the unexpected".That's why they have that red button, right?
The upshot of all this?To the degree that you feel "certain" about something, to that
degree you're consulting your memory and disregarding your "margin of
error".Rather than the direct
experience of the moment (which has elements of "unknown" to it),
you're experiencing indirectly through your acquired (known) memories of
experience.
If you're intelligently present to the present moment,
you're uncertain, but receptive -- directly confronting the mystery of reality,
not "already knowing", as the next moment of ordinary experience occurs.
Knowledge is approximate, but helps us put our attention on
something.Direct experience is always*already
unknown in any absolute sense, but known relative to accumulated memories.
When the weight of those accumulated memories fades, so does
the apparent "certainty of knowing" fade.We realize Mystery to be the case.We don't know.
Distinguish clearly between the two -- relative knowledge
(sufficiently knowing) and absolute knowledge (truthfully unknowing).Know the difference between direct experience
(in mystery about what's coming next) and memory (approximate expectation based
on what came, before).
Do you?
LANGUAGE
Language gives us a handle on things. That's useful,
obviously -- but it's also approximate because it depends on memory.
Language also puts something between ourselves and direct
experience: words.People commonly pay
more attention to words (and thinking) than we do to direct experience; we even
confuse the two, thinking they are the same.
Because the emphasis on language and knowing is the
foundation of education, the noise of the word-mind gets "louder"
than our direct experience and our "truth-sense".People lose touch with reality, more in touch
with thinking -- their thinking -- than with direct experience.They become more and more "conventional"
thinkers, conformists, mediocre persons -- inside "the box".They even override conscience.
People who know something about something may act as if what
they know is all they need to know about it, or even all there is to
know about it.
As soon as we get recognize something, that's it; we tend to
cease to pay attention to details. Our attention becomes superficial. Errors of
judgment occur. Actions get taken in
haste. Mistakes get made. Quality of life ceases to improve or goes down.
People get reluctant to adjust to change, to "make an
exception", when called for by a situation.They miss opportunities because they feel as
if, "I already know what's what -- and that ain't it."
When people run their lives by "word-knowledge",
they tend to give their intelligence over to those who seem to have more
word-knowledge, for example, to the news media.
If you can "talk a good talk", you get
credibility.
Assuming that others are more intelligent than we are
because they can talk the talk better than we can is the perfect description of
the mind of a child.
When people don't think things through, for themselves, they
blithely (casually and automatically) accept popular views of things. They get
intellectually lazy.Critical thinking
goes out the window.
But there exists an even more insidious effect of language:
Hardened attitudes form.
People automatically believe and act as if their own thinking
is correct (even if they claim to be "open minded" or
"skeptical"); they lose intelligence.
The "I already know" mentality leads to anxieties
and, sometimes, to unnecessary pre-emptive actions (such as wars or breaking up
from an intimate friend or partner).
People who operate primarily from their
"word-minds" tend to override their feelings (e.g., conscience) in
favor of "what they know" (what reason suggests is necessary). That
explains The News, politics, economic catastrophes, wars, racism (and other
'isms'), educational incompetence and social injustices.
It also explains people's unwillingness to acknowledge and
correct their mistakes -- especially in politics (where correcting mistakes may be unfairly
criticized as, "flip-flopping" or incompetence) and large-scale
control situations, like corporations.
Unfortunately, people have been "educated" to make
knowledge their (unacknowledged) religion (and indeed, the basis of all
organized religion) and their stream of thought is uninterrupted and interminable.They commonly go with (and defend) their own thinking
as if they were correct and wise because the appearance of knowledge makes
people look good, and not to know makes them look bad.
Experience is a lot more fluid than what language can
contain.Life is mysterious.You don't even know your next thought, never
mind what's going to happen next. Our knowledge and expectations are
approximate and often entirely wrong.
The "knowledge cult" of "education"
makes people dense.
Knowledge has gotten too big for its britches.
Combine The Pitfall
of Memory with The Pitfall of Language, You Get The Entry of Untruth.
Memory and language started with the intention to be
truthful and useful.
However, once someone recognized that they could manipulate
others with language, the possibility of dishonesty entered the picture.
Now, "truth" is regarded as "a fashionable
way of looking at something" -- and dishonest terms, such as
"alternate facts" and "fake news", have gained entry.
Now, people use language without regard for truthfulness to
manipulate others.
Language, which previously was an instrument for
manipulating experience, has become something to be manipulated, itself.
Enter advertising, fiction, political speeches and falsehoods
of all kinds.
Am I touching a nerve, here?
The Price of
Truthfulness?
People have commonly come to regard truthfulness as having a
cost that may be greater than the cost of untruth.True?
Memories of experience, or memories of stories, may make it
seem, so.Common social attitudes about
truthfulness, as portrayed in entertainment, may make it seem so.
So, people's truth-sense has been blunted.
Some people consider it, "sophisticated", to
distort the truth and get away, with it.
The Price of Being
False
Being false has a heavy price -- and people sell out their
integrity, for cheap.
The heavy price comes in the form of loss of the reliability
of memory, the loss of trust, and the loss of the full use of ones faculties
that comes from the loss of integrity.People sell out "for cheap" -- and they don't recognize the
price because they suppress that knowledge, in themselves.When they sell out for cheap, they betray
themselves.
Enter stupidity, incompetence, criminal investigations, and divorce
lawyers.Mental health goes downhill;
depression sets in. Alcohol and drug use increase.Actions needed never happen.Money and resources get wasted.With the impairment of mental capacity and the
loss of trust, commerce slows and falters (also known as, "recession"
or "depression").
Make sense?
The solution to this abuse of language is to recognize that
"truth" is not something that can be made up and that integrity is
not something "costs"; it is to recognize that truth and integrity
gird the power to accomplish.A blunted
truth-sense is one meaning of "the blind leading the blind."
To clean up a situation, we must intervene where the problem
is -- not outside us, but in our "truth sense".
Our "truth sense" gets distorted when we put "word-mind"
and memory ahead of direct experience ( about being in mystery of "what's
coming next").
We must get control of the balance between memory and
imagination; we must rehabilitate our "truth sense".
We'll get to that at the end.
TECHNOLOGY and THE ARTS -- THE PRODUCTS of MINDS and HANDS
and THE DUMBING DOWN OF CIVILIZATION
Technology
Up to a point, technology gives us more freedom. However,
that freedom exacts a price: obliviousness, stagnation, irresponsibility -- and
it eats up our time.
Art
Up to a point, art enhances our lives. By distilling the
truth of things in refined expressions, art makes us feel better. That's its
purpose.
But art has been dumbed-down to the point where unrefined
junk has been legitimized as "artistic expression".
Even Feeling Better
May Exact a Price
That "feeling better", whether from technology or
from art, exacts a price: it distracts us from what we feel, without it.
Both technology and art start out as a boon to humanity and
become "opiates of the masses".
Accumulating wealth has the same effect. Often, people
pursue wealth as a way to feel better.As
a rule of thumb, you can tell how emotionally unbalanced and dependent wealthy
people are on the consolations of ownership by the degree of their pursuit of
wealth.
PREOCCUPED by TECHNOLOGICAL 'TOYS'
People become preoccupied by the technologies they use.
Let's talk about two major technologies (that have
significant overlap):
Smart
Phones
Video
Entertainment
Take smart phones.
Smart Phones
A smart phone is a computer in your pocket. It's great for
getting information on the fly.
As a communication device, however, smart phones exact a
heavy price when people would rather text than talk.
Here are the advantages and disadvantages of texting (in
case they're not obvious):
Advantages
Texting
slows conversations down so people may consider what's they're about to
say before they say it
Texting
removes the need for both parties to be available at the same time.
Disadvantages
Texting
removes spontaneity from conversation -- and with it, honesty or
authenticity.
Texting
leaves out the subtlety of communication that comes from tone of voice and
pacing of a response.
Texting makes communication into "thin soup" --
and many people prefer it that way.
Users of social media like Facebook substitute frequency of
trivial communications for depth of relationship -- and they may not know any
better if they've grown up with smart phones.
People confuse the little "lift" they get when
they hear a "message chime" with the feeling of actual connection
with someone else, which is far richer and more detailed than a chime -- and
also more demanding of their intelligence and emotional maturity.
So, people substitute "hello" for depth of
interaction. The quality of relationships goes down. More "thin
soup".
Smart phones have another effect -- an obvious one.What's the most obvious sign that someone is
occupied with his or her smart phone?
Their head is forward and face-down and they're completely
oblivious to their surroundings.
Smart phones teach people to narrow their attention -- the
opposite of what happens with maturation (expansion of their field of attention
to include more of the world) -- and the opposite of what's needed in a healthy
society.
More than that, the "head down" position is the
position of non-involvement or even of submission (as to "the status
quo").
So, for many, using a smart phone cultivates obliviousness,
superficiality, a narrowed field of activity and non-involvement.
Those effects lead to boredom -- and to intensified
dependency on the most distraction-rich object in the immediate environment:
their smart phone.
And the civilization nosedive continues.
Watching Video
Video entertainment and entertainment, in general, train
people to be more spectator than participant. There's a price, for that, which has placed
civilization at higher risk.
Entertainment distracts.The distraction is distraction from their own lives.
So, during the Great Depression of the 1930s, movies were
the great distraction.They featured
stories about wealthy people with servants, top hats, high-ceilings, polished
floors, art deco apartments and big houses.
Nowadays, the makers of video content mostly go for
"catching people's attention", rather than for excellent entertainment
-- hence, the frequency of material involving guns, violence, danger, and alarming
messages -- all of which catch attention on "the Stress Channel".
It's "junk food" -- bad entertainment put out there just because
"it sells" -- not because it's high quality entertainment.That goes for The News, too.
People live their lives in "the swimming pool of
culture". Because the
"waters" of the "swimming pool" have become so dirty with
emotional disturbance and stress, almost anything that distracts (and gives
some relief from the sense of being immersed in "dirty emotional
waters") will "sell" -- so the makers of video content (and
movies, and music) sell almost anything that will sell, as
entertainment.
Have you noticed?
Video has another effect on people:it teaches them to be unresponsive spectators.That's why they call it "watching"
video.What can anyone do about the
calamities reported in the news?Nothing
but watch.
So, apart from sports (about which fans get all emotional,
but do nothing more), people sit in front of video and just watch.
Video trains people are to see, hear, and experience emotion
-- and not to take action.
For fiction, that's appropriate.
For political news, the "passivity-training" of
video leads to a passive, controllable population of consumers.
SUMMARY on SMART PHONES and VIDEO
So, smart phones may be interactive, but they narrow
people's focus to themselves and train them to be uninvolved with what's around
them (and you can see that in any store where people appear to be oblivious to
the people around them).
Video may broaden people's view of life, but it trains them
to take no initiative, to let others take the initiative.
Video and smart phones are a microcosm of what goes on in a
technological culture, as a whole.They
"contain" people in a stagnant, or degenerative, way of life.
They dumb people down.
OTHER KINDS of TECHNOLOGY
Other kinds of technology complete the "enclosure"
or "encapsulation" of "the swimming pool of culture" --
everything from religion to shopping malls. They're all built upon the same
rehash of standard (remembered) attitudes and standard (subliminally
remembered) values, generally, money, food, and sex and the emergencies of life.
The conveniences of technology have led people to become
complacent and numb (dumb) about the precarious and degenerating state of civilization.This state of degeneration is so familiar
that the very idea that things could be very different seems novel,
inconvenient, or hard to understand, for some (many) people.
MAD SCIENTIST TECHNOLOGY
Now, I want to address the "creator side".
Up to this point, I've addressed the "consumer
side" of technology.However,
there's a darker side:technology taken
too far or the wrong direction.
In science fiction stories, there exists the character
called, The Mad Scientist.
In Sci-Fi stories, The Mad Scientist is always involved in
doing what should not be done -- what others feel should not be done and what
they, themselves, feel should not be done.Mad Scientists go too far.Like adolescents, they chafe against limits -- just like
adolescents.
Mad Scientists really exist and provide profit centers for
big businesses such as Monsanto, Bayer, and the Big Pharma companies.
Mad scientists develop artificial "food
products"."Frankenfood"
is a term applied to food products derived from genetic engineering.
Let me offer a statement of something that should be
obvious:
Just because
something could be done doesn't mean that it should be done.
With this statement, I'm going against the preferences of
enthusiasts of bioengineering and artificial intelligence.
They feel that
Any
direction they can explore, with science, they should explore, as
if that were a moral imperative of science.
They
have no responsibility for how their findings are used.
That's like saying they have no responsibility for how their
offspring (children) relate to others or how others relate to their offspring.
They may say, "But that's different."
I'm saying that it isn't different.Their scientific and technological
developments are their offspring.I'm saying that the responsibility is exactly the same, whether it's
biology or technology."Do your
best, responsibly, to see to it that your offspring are a benign influence in
the world; don't just let them loose like bats out of a belfry," -- or
practice "contraception".Since innovators don't often have control of their offspring,
perhaps they should use good judgment and sometimes, practice the latter:refuse to participate.
I'm saying that the, "That's not my responsibility,"
attitude is irresponsible, more irresponsible than the attitude of Dr.
Frankenstein because they may not claim innocence.
Whether or not it's your job and someone is paying you to do
it, you are to be responsible.
Now, to make some points, I'll say more about two of the pet
projects of science and technology: bioengineering and artificial intelligence.
BIOENGINEERING
By this term, I'm referring to genetic engineering and
"cyborg" technology -- and I'll explain.
Genetic engineering involves tinkering with the DNA sequencing
that controls the development and behavior of living creatures.
Cyborg technology involves implanting devices into living
creatures.
I'll talk about both.
Genetic Engineering
Enthusiasts of genetic engineering cite the benefits -- treating
diseases, more productive agriculture, and technical problem-solving.
What they're enthusiastic about, really, is the profit
potential.What they don't seem to care
about are the side-effects.
How can we tell?Look
at how business take advantage of profit potential and avoid responsibility for
the greater effects on affected populations.Look at Flint, Michigan;
look at the lawsuits filed by Monsanto against farmers who don't use their GMO
seed; look at the decimation of bee populations by Bayer products.
Side-Effects
For all actions, there are side effects.There are no exceptions.Some are greater than others, but
side-effects always occur and they are always unanticipated (just as a
combination of new ingredients produces new results).
Cooking makes a mess.Sex complicates relationships.High finance increases economic burdens.All political solutions make some people unhappy.All technology creates pollution.Even peeing creates splashes in all
directions!Side-effects.
Humans are inherently unprepared for side-effects because
they can't predict them all.The
side-effects they know about (from past experience), they manage for better,
for worse, or not at all -- and their managing of them produces more
side-effects.
Managing
Side-Effects Produces More Side-effects
For example, pharmaceutical drugs have side-effects
(including drug interactions) -- which physicians attempt to manage by
prescribing additional drugs -- but which produce additional side-effects.This practice leads to "drug toxicity
(pile-up)".
That's true of drugs that have been extensively tested.
What of the unanticipated side-effects of genetic tinkering
that spill into society and into our environment? Humans don't understand living eco-systems,
very well.They can describe what they
see, but they can't predict changes.
Humans can't predict drug interactions (until after they
have happened); how are they going to predict side-effects from genetic
engineering?How are they going to
manage them?
Humans are in over their heads, when it comes to genetic
engineering, regardless of the individual, predicted effects it can produce.
There's that matter of responsibility.
Cyborg Technology
Replacements for lost organs or limbs are examples of cyborg
technology."Better than
original" enhancements are on the agenda. You can find out about them on
YouTube.com.
Combining cyborg technology with genetic tinkering, Mad
Scientists (who think of themselves as "legitimate scientists")
envision "super-individuals".
Humanity can't competently manage societies as they are,
never mind societies that include artificially enhanced individuals or classes
of individuals.Just look at the
controversy surrounding "doping" in athletics, a bare hint of what
may come.
Controversy Depends
on the Legitimacy of Two Views
Talk of these topics as being, "controversial",
seems to hold that there is comparable legitimacy to advancing bioengineering
in the ways I have been discussing.
There is no legitimacy to arguments in favor of this kind of
bioengineering because it's sanctioned and conducted by people whose ability
(and willingness) to imagine and manage side-effects (foresight and
conscience) is either inadequate to the scope of their undertaking -- or
suppressed in favor of "foreseeable profits and ego status".
I'm saying that they should restrain themselves and, at
least, retrain themselves, so that the four factors of intelligence in
them are well-turned-on and integrated before they go dabbling in the
irreversible.
Asking them to do that may be like asking adolescents to
practice abstinence.
Artificial
Intelligence ("AI")
The term, "artificial intelligence" covers
everything from "devices that think" to the notion of
transferring individual (personal) consciousness from a living body to an
electronic device.Just ask Siri (Apple computer
OS) or Alexa (Windows OS).
It's all ridiculous -- for two reasons:
"Devices
that think" put more power into the hands of self-serving individuals
who already abuse the power that they have -- think of the invasion of
privacy by the NSA
Artificial
Intelligence creates the risk of devices taking over civilization as
humans hand more and more responsibility and control over to them (as
humans are prone to do). Unpredicted side-effects are inevitable.
Consciousness
is not a product of the brain that can be moved about.
A brain is just a matter-energy
arrangement.Changing an arrangement
only changes the experience of the arrangement.Ask yourself, "How can re-arranging something produce
consciousness?"
Consciousness is a property of
matter/energy, whatever the arrangement.
Here's a related question:The operation of the brain consists of
electro-chemical impulses.How do
electrical impulses become sensations (never mind, consciousness)?
I haven't even started talking about emotions.
The idea of "exporting
consciousness" rests upon unfounded (and blithely accepted) assumptions.These people are going to export
consciousness to electronic devices?
Again, it's a case of irresponsibility and self-indulgence
adding massive complexity to a civilization that is already "under
water" (bogged down) managing the complexity that already exists.
Who pays?Humanity
and the biosphere pay.Who profits?You know.
This is what happens when Mad Scientists get paid to
do their work.
In a way, the Mad Scientist is an exaggerated form of
the corrupt politician and "the organization man".They do what should not be done for the
benefit of their special interests, rather than looking after the common good
for current and future generations.
LOOKING AT ALL THREE AREAS, AGAIN
In each of these three areas, language, memory, and
technology, those who are somewhat more advanced have tended to seek dominion,
or advantage over, those who are less advanced -- and they think that's O.K.
because their truth-sense has been blunted by their cultural conditioning.
However, that state of affairs isn't necessary or built into
language, memory and technology; it's that people are poorly educated and
complacent.
Because people are complacent, they don't take responsibility
for social conditions that, on one hand, cause social (e.g., economic)
imbalances and unnecessary suffering or for the exploiters-in-power who create
those conditions. They tolerate them because they are pacified into complacency
by distraction and nominal satisfaction of needs.
Meanwhile, "Rome
burns" as crises converge on human civilization.
All of this happens because a dumbed-down population allows
scientists and technologists who aren't playing with a full deck to have free
rein.
And that's the fault of the current "cult of
education".Here's how.
SHORTCHANGED by EDUCATION
The fault lies entirely with those who control education, or
who pass on tradition, both of which seek to give "ownership" power
to those in the know and in possession.
The very purpose of education has to do with continuity of
what has gone before.Education is the
means by which civilization passes from generation to generation. But it has
been cheapened and degraded by making education the servant of commerce, i.e.,
money.
Education, as currently practiced, is out of
balance.It's not playing with a full
deck.
The result?a stunted
and blunted "truth sense", stunted creativity -- and stunted conscience
and lack of self-regulation
THE FOUR "SUITS" of INTELLIGENCE
There are four basic "suits" of intelligence:
imagination | intention | memory | attention
Every learned ability depends upon all four, not just upon
any one of them.
But education (both basic and higher) primarily emphasizes only
one of those four basic aspects of intelligence -- memory -- and leaves the
others to "fend for themselves".
Because the idea that there are four basic aspects of
intelligence that underlie ALL expressions of intelligence, may be a new idea, to
you, I will point you to a resource (at the end of this piece) to help you get
a better handle on the four.
For now, I will talk more in summary about them.
The Fault Lies with
an Educational Process -- Whether Formal or Informal -- that Fails to Educate
all of the Suits of Intelligence.
Education is overwhelmingly about memorizing, memorizing,
memorizing. That's what makes it so unpleasant, so boring.
Even the idea of "understanding" something has
more to do with stringing remembered together things than of awakening
intuitive depth of understanding. Intuitive understanding is even disparaged in
"hard" fields of study like mathematics and science, even though
those fields emerged on the "coattails" of intuition.
The three other suits of intelligence, if equally
emphasized, would enhance human development far more than memorization, alone
-- and would rehabilitate people's truth-sense.
To re-state, those three other "suits" are ...
ATTENTION|INTENTION|IMAGINATION
Of those, imagination is what gives flavor to a learning
experience. Imagination is the "incoming channel" for new experiences,
for insight, for foresight, for ingenuity, and for intuition.
Developing imagination (in tandem with memory, attention,
and deliberate intention) leads to new discoveries; developing attention (in tandem with intention and memory) sharpens the ability to see details and
relationships; developing intention (in
tandem with imagination, memory and attention) leads to fine work.New
discoveries, details and relationships, fine work.
See how bringing
all four up to speed would rehabilitate people's truth-sense?
However, in education, imagination has been made the
handmaiden of memorization.
Playing with a Full
Deck
Only secondarily is education (as practiced) about the other
three mental faculties. In educational settings attention is only expected (and hoped for) or cleverly enticed by "education-as-entertainment" -- but not intelligently (that is, directly) cultivated by students, themselves.
Doesn't it seem so, to you?
Intention and
Attention
Back to "the four suits", in educational settings,
the exercise of the intention (to pass on knowledge) gets enforced by means of
bribery and threats (grades and approval or disapproval).
So, students develop the intention to pay attention, in
class -- more or less -- and become more and more habituated, in general, to
bribery and threats being standard operating procedure.
That's about as far as developing intention and attention go
in education -- the intention to pay attention enough to memorize something, and, in higher education, the intention to play by the rules well enough to secure the approval of academic authorities and grant providers.
Imagination
Only secondarily is education about imagination, which in
educational settings is barely cultivated. I'm not saying imagination isn't used in certain curricula; I'm saying it isn't cultivated. Whatever imaginative capacity a student may have is to considered what he has to work with, not something that can and should be cultivated, specifically!
So, as a result, you've noticed, if you've been paying
attention, that imaginativeness has declined under our present educational
approach; the quality of entertainment has declined in recent times because of
the decline of imaginativeness (even if technical execution has improved
because of technology). Improvements of technology seem to occur devoid of foresight or conscience, in some largely influential quarters (such as agribusiness, petrochemical and pharmaceutical companies).
Imagining and
Remembering are Part of Each Other.
In common learning, if you want to memorize something, you
imagine it repeatedly, to yourself, until it "sticks" (consolidates
as a memory).
However, it's common for one to dominate the other.Imagination is the flow of newness from the
unknown; memory is the consolidation and perpetuation of what has gone
before.
When memory dominates, we expect that how things have been
is how they will be, again.Memory
inherently biases imagination.
It's also possible for imagination to dominate memory, as in
situations of denial, as well as in situations of inspiration.Imagination transcends memory; imagination is
the "mouth" that is open to Mystery.
In formal education, term projects and term papers are more
about showing that you have memorized the material than about creating anything
new (too far in advance of the standard view of things), so memory dominates.
The Traditional
Standard of Education is Gone.
There once existed a rationale for the curriculum required
to earn a degree, "to develop well-rounded individuals". That
rationale has been abandoned. Few
well-rounded individuals emerge from education. Education turns out idiots;
just read the news.
The process so disproportionately emphasizes memory --
inclusion of studies in the humanities and in the sciences notwithstanding ---
that the few well-rounded individuals who do emerge are well-rounded because
they followed their own interests, not the educational curriculum.Such "well-rounded individuals" are
called, "visionaries."
CHANGE:THE ORDER
of the DAY
People generally don't change unless they feel they have to
– and the recognition that they have to depends upon their ability (and
willingness) to take changing conditions into account -- changing conditions that
they tend to overlook or ignore if those conditions are new and no memories
exist, of them -- as in the changes, these days.
The cultural acceptance of new things relies entirely upon
the willingness of people to relax their grip on what they already know and to
open themselves to what they do not already know. But they can't -- due to the
indoctrination of conventional, knowledge-based education into the habit of
having a tight grip on memory.
Humanity has become bound up in patterns of memory that
perpetuate "ethnic cleansing" (an abomination of a term for culture
wars and attempted genocide), corporate competition, political
unscrupulousness, obsolete ways of doing things, entrenched wealth, power and
status; denial of problems that absolutely need solving, and value systems that
confer advantage to the few at the disadvantage of the many.
Sound like the governments of totalitarian regimes? or the U.S.
government?
Acceptance of
Change Requires Trust as Well as Abstract Faith.
One of the requirements for accepting cultural change, is
trust.Trust is trust in the truth.
Ordinarily the sense of truth comes from memory.If something fits our memory or is plausible
because of what we remember, we are inclined to accept its truth.
We find it easier to imagine things we remember, and that's
the basis for our truth-sense and our ability to recognize anything.
If we can't imagine something, we tend not to consider it,
truth, and don't trust it.
When the changes of the times are unprecedented or don't
correspond to our memory of how things have been, they don't trigger our
truth-sense. We may remain doubtful.
In addition, belief in the legitimacy of "alternative
truths" undermines trust in the truth, and that leaves us unprepared for
great changes, such as we are experiencing, these days.
That's what happens when people operate primarily from
memory, as trained by conventional education.People remain mistrustful and slow to change.
The whole orientation of education is at fault. It's at
fault for two simple reasons:
It uses
memorization without equally cultivatingimagination, attention, and intentionality, so people most always
develop with handicapped intelligence.
It teaches
people to evaluate reality on based on memory and to avoid "not
knowing" ("being in mystery").People become slower to recognize
changes and remain slow to do something new, even when something new is
called for.
Under memorization-based education, the response to
drastically changing conditions tends to be either an emergency response to
perpetuate the old order and old knowledge, mere denial, or the emergency
seeking of new solutions while ensnared by old ways of acting and thinking.
What people need is a "re-set" of the truth-sense
back to "clear".
The term, attention refreshment-rate, is apt.
Let me explain the term, a bit more.
I'll use the example of video.
The earliest video technology, moving pictures (film)
consisted of a series of still photographs taken in rapid succession on a long
strip of film at a rate of 16 frames per second. Those films, when viewed at
their original rate, have a jerky appearance. The jerky appearance is due to
the amount of change that occurs from frame to frame missing all of the changes
that occurred between frames. The refresh rate of film, at that time, being 16
frames per second, was much slower than the refresh rate of human attention, so
we perceive the jerkiness and the lost detail of change from frame to frame.
It's for that reason that the frame rate of film was increased to 24 frames per
second, and of electronic video, to 30 frames per second.
Human attention has a refresh rate. Unlike video, which has
a set refresh rate, human attention has a very variable attention-refreshment
rate. Smart people have a high attention-refreshment rate; they can take in a
lot of information because they are capable of capturing more detail because of
their higher attention-refreshment rate. Stupid people have a slow attention-refreshment
rate. They can take in much less detail because of that lower rate. They're
even called, slow.
The refresh-rate of humanity has failed to speed up enough
for people either to take in the details of new conditions sufficiently quickly
and sufficiently intelligently to change quickly or effectively enough to face
the onslaught of accelerating change.
Memory puts drag into the refresh rate of attention. Attention
has to come free of memory enough to allow new impressions to come in. Two
things can't occupy the same space at the same time.
This is not to say that stupid people are stupid because
they have too many memories, though that's true. Consider feuds and
long-standing ethnic antagonisms.
It is to say that even a smart person, when he or she becomes
too attached to memories and knowledge, loses mental flexibility (the capacity to
imagine, to "think outside the
box") and so to lag in ability to change. They become entrenched, and with
entrenchment, all of the systems through which authority leads to action become
mired in the incompetence that comes from failure to change.
That's why technological breakthroughs generally come from
outside the main stream.
Attention to memory without the counter-balancing of imagination
acted upon intentionally, bogs us down.
SUMMARY on LANGUAGE
Language, for all the advantages it has brought to humanity,
has the ultimate disadvantage of representing all experiences as,
"knowns" when things are changing at an accelerating pace.
Language brings premature closure to the openness of
intelligence that can see things as they are, rather than as they are known or
as they are remembered.
Language makes experiences seem like objectively-existing
things, reliable and with predictable substantiality that no longer need observation
in order to know what to do. It gives apparent substantiality to reality.
The lack of descriptive language about somethingor someone (new) makes it unknown,
unpredictable, and so, a possible danger.
SUMMARY on MEMORY
When people run their lives based on what they think they
know, without having the "grain of sale" provided by the truth that
Mystery pertains to every situation, where "knowing" means,
"having words for" and "being ready for", they are out of
touch with reality. They can become a danger to themselves and to others. Do
you follow the news?
The general population, who are not so smart, are even more
affected by the accumulation of memories. Their "attention refreshment"
rate is slowed down; their minds are gummed up. They are less willing than the
better educated -- or even unable to change -- because of their sense of being
over-challenged by the requirement to change with the times. They stick with
what they know and avoid change as much as possible. They are laggard, in a
state of arrested development at a time when change is accelerating.
For that reason, things get out of hand and change seems to
happen at a rate faster than the general population can handle – and so they
(and political "conservatives") try to slow change down.
So, the enshrinement of word-mind memory by education, entertainment,
propaganda, and tradition (memory) has started out as a boon to humanity and
become an impending disaster due to learned incapacity, laggardness and
stupidity -- all this in a population that generally considers itself
reasonably intelligent.
Get the picture?
CHEMICALLY SLOWING the ATTENTION-REFRESHMENT RATE
Alcohol, the most publicly approved intoxicant of choice,
specifically makes the problem worse. Alcohol slows down the attention refresh
rate.
That's why people use it: so that they take in less of their
lives and don't feel so much distress at the way their lives actually are.
That's the reality behind the saying, "I need a drink."
Alcohol inhibits the prefrontal cortex of the brain -- the seat
of discerning intelligence and self-control of behavior -- and stimulates the
pleasure centers of the brain – making being dull-witted or stupid a pleasure.
Opioids have similar effects. Know about the "opioid epidemic"?
So, we see the bias of humanity toward a lower attention-refreshment
rate, toward the enthronement of "the thinking mind", and toward a
generally lower level of intelligence in the face of drastically changing
planetary conditions.
The educational processes reflect that bias.
That bias, in turn, reflects the evolutionary state of
humanity. For the past 10,000 years of recorded history, we have seen the
advantages of learning (knowledge), in the development of human civilization:
cultural development, language development, and technology.
Humanity has become so successful from these evolutionary
developments that it has become a threat to itself and our environment.
The development of memory, the memory-bias of education, and
the valuing of knowledge and power that come from education have led to an
unsustainable convergence of world-situations into one giant situation: an
overpopulated planet controlled by memory bound individuals bent upon
maintaining and extending what they have and what they know (remember) against
the wills of others who have different sets of memories and different
self-interests.
That mentality, today, is analogous to that of a morbidly
obese person (who is in no danger of starvation) constantly having food on
their mind and intent upon stealing the food of others. How smart is that?
I'm also not saying to abolish knowledge. That would
obviously be ridiculous.
What I'm saying is, teach humans to increase their
attention-refreshment-rate, so they can take in new information and
let go of ways that no longer work or are no longer sustainable.
That's the needed "pivot point" of the times and
the missing – and next necessary – dimension of education:to teach people to increase their attention
refresh rate by learning to dissolve the grip of memory -- and to
rehabilitate the recognition of Mystery, for perspective.This rehabilitation is not a product of
knowing intellect, but a truth-based intuitive foundation of existence
that rehabilitates creativity, conscience, and self-restraint.
Higher Intelligence
To dissolve the grip of memories doesn't make them
inaccessible; it just makes space for the new to emerge. Memory impressions
remain, but in a less dense state that leaves them out of the way unless
experience calls for them.To dissolve the
grip of memories (on an item by item basis) decreases people's density as human
beings.It makes people more perceptive,
quicker-witted, more freely spontaneous ... better fine-tuned to the moment.
This "dissolving the grip" process is exactly what
is meant by, "lightening things up"; it's what psychotherapy is
supposed to accomplish; it's what forgiveness is supposed to be about; it's
what meditation is supposed to do; it's what the term, "open-minded"
signifies, it's the prerequisite for adjusting to new situations, for doing new
things in a new way, for clearing the way for intelligence, for surviving and
thriving in a changing world that requires different things of us, as
individuals and as a species, than in the past.
Times are changing more quickly. The accelerating rate of
world change requires a higher attention refresh rate -- the ability to take in
more detail more quickly that results from less mental noise (persistent
memory) gumming up the learning mechanism.
We need to be a smarter humanity. The way to develop intelligence
better, in the educational process, is to integrate memory with its three
complementary aspects of intelligence, imagination, attention, and intention.
That very integration restores the sense
of Mystery -- something you may not have anticipated.
The deliberate dissolution of the grip of memory may call up
a certain anxiety, in you. That's evidence in you of the bias in your education
and in the way our current civilization has conditioned you. That anxiety is
not a sign of what should not be done; it's a sign of exactly what should be
done. The dissolution is a freeing and a relief.
You may feel that you don't know how to do that. That's
exactly my point. You've been taught to memorize, memorize, memorize, but not taught
how to integrate memory with the three other "suits" of intelligence
that make all the difference.
Because you're not used to the idea, it may make you
anxious. But there's nothing daunting, threatening or dangerous about it. It's
about clarity -- just that.
SO, THE SUMMARY
The bias toward persistent memory that made humanity so
successful has become so successful that it is pandemic and is endangering
human civilization.
The enthronement of language-based learning that has made
humanity so successful has deluded humanity about what is real and what is
remembered or imagined.
The products of "mind and hand" that have so
enhanced humanity's survival have led to complacency and to the limitations
that now so jeopardize civilization.
People need to "get it straight".
We, the human species must now use more of our intelligence
and reduce the stupidities of corporate identity, national identity, ethnic
identity, and personal identity -- or else the memories of our civilization may
be dissolved by an onslaught of calamities, along with the human species,
ourselves.
I promised you a way to get more information on the four "suits"
of intelligence that must be integrated to increase the attention-refreshment
rate an to open the way to intelligent change.
